![]() ![]() This means I cannot safely plug in a mooltipass into a computer I don’t trust, because there’s a chance it could exploit and reprogram my deviceĢ.5) It’s Arduino compatible. I literally have never put a password on my mooltipass because I don’t have, want, nor will I use Chrome (or Chromium or any of its derivatives)Ģ) The physical interface you use to reprogram the device is the same as the physical interface you plug in to the computer you’re going to enter the password into. There are a bunch of tiny decisions which drive me insane:ġ) Literally unusable unless you use Chrome (the browser). It’s meant to hold a whole bunch of usernames and passwords which you need in a specific place: your less commonly used passwords at work and at home.īut the worst part for me is the software. It’s basically meant to hold your usernames and passwords that you don’t “always” need with you. You can kind of get the usecase they were optimizing for based on the fact that they sell a laser-cut stand for it. The response they gave regarding the size of the mooltipass was that there’s a tradeoff between size and usability, but I personally find it pretty useless at this size. It makes it inconvenient to carry it around, so it really only works as a password manager if you are willing to carry that much crap around with you at all times. The mooltipass is huge: it’s like an oversized box of playing cards. Posted in News, Security Hacks Tagged news, password, security Post navigation The best ‘alternative’ result was found when creating poetry: passwords like “Sophisticated potentates / misrepresenting Emirates” and “The supervisor notified / the transportation nationwide” produced a 60-bit password that was at least as memorable as the xkcd method. ![]() This produced the results you would expect from a webcomic. First, they created an xkcd password generator with a 2048-word dictionary to create passwords such as ‘photo bros nan plain’ and ’embarrass debating gaskell jennie’. In their paper, the researchers set out to create random, memorable 60-bit passwords in an English word sequence. Just imagine what a man from Nantucket will do to a battery staple. ‘Correct Horse Battery Staple’ only provides a 44-bit password, though, and researchers at the University of Southern California have a better solution: prose and poetry. By memorizing a long phrase, a greater number of bits are more easily encoded in a user’s memory, making a password much harder to crack. did offer us a solution: a Correct Horse Battery Staple. The usual requirements of a number, capital letter, or punctuation mark force users to create unmemorable passwords, leading to post-it notes the techniques that were supposed to make passwords more secure actually make us less secure, and yes, there is an xkcd for it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |